Monday, June 24, 2024  
- DTN Headline News
Stomp on SCN Yield Losses - 3
By Pamela Smith
Thursday, June 20, 2024 10:36AM CDT

Editor's Note: Weeds, insects and disease all have potential to reduce soybean yields, yet there's a hidden pest beneath the soil that costs U.S. farmers $1.5 billion annually. Despite this, soybean cyst nematode (SCN) often goes unchecked. In a special series called, "Stomp on SCN Yield Losses," DTN/Progressive Farmer has taken an in-depth look at how farmers can assess SCN infestations in their fields. We also provided steps growers can take to manage the pest and limit its spread, while also looking ahead to future solutions.

Today, in our third and final story of the series, we share the latest research into genetic mechanisms for bolstering SCN resistance.


It turns out being dysfunctional isn't always a bad thing -- at least in the soybean world.

Researchers have uncovered a new and unexpected way to tackle soybean cyst nematode (SCN) by introducing a "dysfunctional" or a bad copy of a resistance gene.

A gene identified as GmSNAP02 has been a known component of several types of native resistance deployed to protect soybean varieties from SCN. Yet, scientists only recently have begun to understand that the gene may be helping SCN overcome genetic resistance mechanisms in the soybean plant.

Now there's hope manipulating GmSNAP02 might deliver a sucker punch to preserve the utility of varietal resistance in soybeans.

"Think of it like a lock-and-key model, where SCN is the key and GmSNAP02 is the lock," explained Melissa Mitchum, professor in the College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences at the University of Georgia and a member of the research team that made the discovery. "If you get rid of that lock, the nematode can't access the plant. You make the parasite ineffective."


Farmers have relied on PI 88788 genetic resistance in soybean varieties for decades, but overuse has eroded the utility of the tool. Consequently, there's an urgency for alternative modes of resistance to be rotated with PI 88788 to control SCN populations. Peking-based resistance, which contains three genes, has become the new tool of choice, although commercial soybean varieties containing it remain limited.

This new research shows nematodes can reproduce on Peking genetic resistance and appear to be doing it by exploiting GmSNAP02. Mitchum explained it's now believed some types of resistance work better than others because they lose this GmSNAP02 protein, circumventing the nematodes and making the plant more resistant.

The fact that Peking resistance contains three genes is critical in the nematode battle, said Andrew Scaboo, assistant professor in the Division of Plant Science and Technology at the University of Missouri, who is spearheading the project with Mitchum. However, if farmers use Peking exclusively, nematodes will develop resistance.

"This is where this fourth gene comes into play. Adding a nonfunctioning copy of GmSNAP02 enhances the nematode resistance of Peking," Scaboo said. "If we can come up with a strategy for using this and other genes in rotation, we could avoid a repeat of the situation we now have with PI 88788."

A quadruple stack would enhance the genetic diversity on the market, which is critical to long-term management of SCN.

"As we bring different modes of action into the rotation, we enhance the durability of all the tools in our toolbox," Mitchum said.


Scaboo is roughly halfway into a three-year process developing the plant material needed to test whether the GmSNAP02 omission impacts yield. That question must be answered before the new resistance tool can be moved toward commercialization.

"Nearly every major company and some of the smaller ones have reached out for more information since the report on the discovery was published," Scaboo said. "That signals they know SCN is a big problem for farmers."

The fact that CRISPR gene editing can be used to "knock out" GmSNAP02 is an advantage, especially for breeders working with a Peking background. "CRISPR technology facilitates and speeds along the breeding process for forging this stack," the Missouri researcher said.

Seed companies are invested in the longevity of their soybean varieties. "One way to give products longevity is with better control of pathogens," Scaboo explained. "With GmSNAP02, the private sector can pursue prescriptive management strategies for pathogens such as SCN. The resistance this gene provides has the potential not only to protect soybeans and raise yield, but also to manage SCN long term."


Looking ahead, Mitchum said it's important to understand how SCN targets GmSNAP02. "Hopefully, that understanding will give insight into how we can further enhance durability of the tools in our toolbox and add to it," she added.

Technological advances are also shifting the conversation on SCN management.

"We are starting to understand the genetic architecture on a level that the resistance source is becoming irrelevant," Scaboo said. "It would be great for seed companies, farmers and the industry to start talking about these resistance genes rather than sources such as Peking or PI 88788."

The GmSNAP02 project was financed by farmer-supplied checkoff dollars by way of the Missouri Soybean Merchandising Council, the North Central Soybean Research Program and the United Soybean Board. The National Science Foundation and USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture also provided grant funding.


To see more in the Stomp on SCN Yield Losses series:

-- Stomp on SCN Yield Losses - 1, "Take an HG Type Test to Avoid Varieties Vulnerable to Soybean Cyst Nematode,"…

-- Stomp on SCN Yield Losses - 2, "Consider These 5 Steps When SCN Threatens to Reduce Soybean Yields,"…

-- Production Blog, "Start Digging for Answers on Nematodes,"…

-- Editors' Notebook, "Fascinating Facts About Soybean Cyst Nematode,"…

Pamela Smith can be reached at

Follow her on social platform X @PamSmithDTN

(ES/cz )

blog iconDTN Blogs & Forums
DTN Market Matters Blog
Editorial Staff
Friday, June 21, 2024 10:50AM CDT
Monday, June 17, 2024 12:58PM CDT
Friday, June 14, 2024 11:00AM CDT
Fundamentally Speaking
Joel Karlin
DTN Contributing Analyst
Thursday, June 20, 2024 1:15PM CDT
Thursday, June 13, 2024 9:17AM CDT
Thursday, June 13, 2024 9:17AM CDT
DTN Ag Policy Blog
Chris Clayton
DTN Ag Policy Editor
Friday, June 21, 2024 12:20PM CDT
Thursday, June 20, 2024 3:22PM CDT
Friday, June 14, 2024 6:46AM CDT
DTN Ag Weather Forum
Bryce Anderson
DTN Ag Meteorologist and DTN Analyst
Friday, June 21, 2024 2:50PM CDT
Thursday, June 20, 2024 10:08AM CDT
Tuesday, June 18, 2024 11:45AM CDT
DTN Production Blog
Pam Smith
Crops Technology Editor
Sunday, June 16, 2024 1:37PM CDT
Tuesday, June 11, 2024 3:33PM CDT
Monday, June 3, 2024 1:29PM CDT
Harrington's Sort & Cull
John Harrington
DTN Livestock Analyst
Monday, June 17, 2024 3:50PM CDT
Monday, June 10, 2024 12:07PM CDT
Monday, June 3, 2024 2:50PM CDT
South America Calling
Editorial Staff
Thursday, May 23, 2024 11:16AM CDT
Thursday, May 16, 2024 11:37AM CDT
Thursday, May 16, 2024 11:37AM CDT
An Urban’s Rural View
Urban Lehner
Editor Emeritus
Friday, June 21, 2024 3:50PM CDT
Tuesday, June 11, 2024 11:33AM CDT
Monday, June 3, 2024 3:21PM CDT
Canadian Markets
Cliff Jamieson
Canadian Grains Analyst
Monday, June 3, 2024 9:25AM CDT
Sunday, April 28, 2024 6:02PM CDT
Monday, April 15, 2024 1:57PM CDT
Editor’s Notebook
Greg D. Horstmeier
DTN Editor-in-Chief
Wednesday, June 19, 2024 6:00AM CDT
Wednesday, June 19, 2024 6:00AM CDT
Wednesday, June 19, 2024 6:00AM CDT
Copyright DTN. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
Powered By DTN